CBC Canada Reads starts this week (March 21-24th) and book nerds everywhere are poised for the action! Now a few of us here at Women From Away take this stuff a bit more seriously than others but we love this contest all the same! This year we have a favourite and this post might just be an endorsement of why you should also love "Birdie" by Tracey Lindberg as much as we did. If you haven't read it, I will try to be vague as to avoid spoilers! I also think it is only fair to disclose our admiration for Tracey Lindberg on a personal level as we hold her as a sort of bookclub patron saint; as you'll see from the photo I have framed and prominently displayed beside my bed below.

"Birdie" was suggested by Lacey last year and was voted in during our intensely thorough voting process at our 2nd Annual Retreat. I think part of the draw for the WFA members was our experience reading "Monkey Beach". For many of us it was our first time reading fiction like this and experiencing what we called Concentric Circles. I think that is actually what it is called... but I don't have a reference to credit on that one (maybe a good time for Nicole or Stephanie to jump in here!). Basically, it is the idea of story telling circling around "the point", which allows the writer to include information that doesn't seem immediately related to said point. With "Monkey Beach" this was done through flash backs or the character reflecting back on previous experiences. This is where I think "Birdie" steps it up a notch.

With "Birdie" the main character isn't so much reflecting back or having a flash back, but actually goes back through her experiences and "re-lives" them to a certain degree to tease out facts or memories about herself and help work through her traumatic life experiences. This can make it very difficult for the reader to follow. Literally, I had to read with a notebook to fill in information about certain characters as I went along - which is a practice I have tried to maintain and I highly recommend. 

For me personally, the circular storytelling of "Birdie" brought out certain points more vividly, for example the concept of women taking up "too much space" and the desire to shrink themselves or even disappear, which Birdie did for certain periods of the story. 

For others in the group, the theme of justice came out strongly as well and we did read through this piece by Val Napoleon. There are a few spoilers in here, so I'll leave it to you to read through. 

The thing I love about "Birdie" and why Tracey Lindberg will forever be my imaginary best friend, is that she covered some of the soul crushing experiences of many First Nations, Metis and Inuit people in colonized regions (not unique to just Canada) but did so in a way that allowed readers, in our case a group of readers to react in their unique ways. This is not a story that a) tells you what happened and then b) tells you or shapes how you should feel about the story. Each woman in our group reacted to certain parts, like "Why is there a bird singing all of a sudden!?" or "Where did the ingredients list come from?" or "I can identify with Bernice feeling like she is "too much" in size or space."

In short, I think you should buy and read "Birdie" by Tracey Lindberg and then vote for it in the Canada Reads poll! And then obviously watch/listen to the whole show down in which ever medium works for you! 

**We were slightly crushed to learn that our "Man on the Side" Wab Kinew is no longer hosting this year but considering it is because he has decided to finally make a step towards being Canada's Prime Minister (albeit a few years from now), we will support the change to Gill Deacon as host**

Year Three Book Five: 

Brain on Fire by Susannah Cahalan

March 3rd, 2016

Lauren: Five stars for me is always the kind of book that I'm riveted by, that I can't put down and I carry it around the house with me. And this was one of those. I think what I liked most was how technical it was. I found it particularly fascinating how doctors go about diagnosing mental illness. One part was explaining how they get people to attempt to draw a clock. They start with the circle and fill in the numbers. Just this simple task can tell so much about what the person is struggling with. Things such as the size of the circle they draw, issues with the layout of the numbers, graphical difficulties with the drawings of the lines/hands and even difficulties with understanding the meaning of the clock can hint at problems with the human brain including what lobe of the brain may be affected.

While reading other reviews, I noticed quite a lot of criticism on how she didn’t seem to incorporate her own feelings and emotions into this book, but I think that’s actually part of what I liked about it. She wasn’t present for a lot of what went on in her life during this time. There were large periods of time where she actually blacked out completely and has no recollection of it. So I think that she wrote the book in the best way that she could – explaining what she went through and explaining how mental issues can be physiological rather than psychological. This is not only a very interesting concept… but also terrifying.

I think this is an important book for people to read and very relevant today. There is so much we don't understand still about the human brain. And so much we don't understand or can't relate to in terms of what other people may be experiencing. It reminds me a bit of these commercials that are out right now where the people are discussing someone missing work because of mental illness. There is still so much negative stigma around these types of illnesses. I found her to be very open and honest about an issue that may have been embarrassing for her and I appreciate that she told her story.

Angela: Here's a surprise - I really enjoyed this book!  I felt that Susannah did a great job of combining the neurological, physiological and personal aspects of her journey together into an engaging and honest narrative. There were parts throughout her telling of the hospitalization where it came across as detached and impersonal but that connects directly to the fact that she has no memory of it.  She did a thorough job of piecing together her own story from other's accounts however you still get the impression that it is just that - other people's stories. 

I found it compelling in that I read it in two sittings and went on to read more about her work afterwards.  I found myself wishing to have a bit more insight or opinion from others and really enjoyed when she did fill us in on the emotions of her family as they went through it with her.  I think her journalism background really came through in how factually she presented her condition (which I appreciated) but also led to the detached nature of her writing style. 

This book really made me think about some of the people I've worked with and known who have been given labels, diagnosed, medicated and/or hospitalized for various 'mental health reasons' but how really so much about the brain is still a mystery.  At the end of the book when she talks about how if she had gotten sick 3 years earlier (before the discovery of her condition) or if she had gone to a different hospital or been assigned a different doctor OR if they had taken the Dr Bailey's word that she was an alcoholic ... what the outcome could have been.  She could have been been dumped in the psych ward for years or even died because of lack of knowledge about what could have saved her.  (My mind explodes just thinking about that!)  

In the end I give it a 4.  Well written and I would recommend it to others.

Amy: This story is wild! Straight up wild! I give it a 5 out of 5! 

I randomly picked this out of the shelf from the Public Library because they had it on display, so when I started I had no previous knowledge about it. After starting it, I couldn't put it down! 

One of the things that really struck me hard and has stuck with me in the year and a half since reading it the first time, is how mental illnesses are perceived. For Susannah is was discovered early that her "brain was on fire" because of an autoimmune disease that affected her in a lot of ways. At first Susannah presents like hundreds of people with mental illness do, but for some combination of luck and privilege she was properly diagnosed and treated. But interestingly, even I have a bias that says "Well, I mean she had an autoimmune disorder. She's not mentally ill!" and some how categorize an Axis I or II as being 'less than' kind of illness. But truly, how are these two types of illness different! So, definitely Susannah's story has challenged my perception of illness that hurt the brain so to speak (ie. delusions, paranoia...).  

Great pick Robyn! We'll all have to watch the movie together! 

Year Three Book Four: 

Green Grass Running Water by Thomas King

January 28th, 2016

Amy: 5 out of 5! Again, sending in my thoughts from a gate at an airport. I read this book in 2009 in university and still love it 7 years later. The story line with Lionel and his "heart condition" seemed like classic comedy to me. And Latisha's restaurant reminded me of a Corner Gas episode and again I giggled out loud to myself.

Some little things I picked up the second time around were the four Indians were referred to as Mr. Black, Mr. Red, Mr. White, Mr. Blue which are sometimes the colours used in the medicine wheel, which I thought was humorous subtly. Other things like the 3 guests at the Dead Dog restaurant called "Louis", "Ray" and "Al" are subtle gabs at colonization and perhaps a way to lighten tension between various relations!

Other thoughts I had were regarding how water played such an important part in all the story lines and connecting them. Is this a reference to Genesis? This was always a theological question for me when reading the beginning of Genesis " God hovered over the water" but if that was the true beginning of time, where did the water come from? Who made it? Did God just find it there by happenstance? Is this King's attempt at offering an explanation?

Also, do the four Indians represent the notion that God's or Deities could make mistakes or be fallible (4 Indians in the car with Norma and Lionel explaining that they are going back to Blossom to fix things they should have ages ago)?

Overall, I love it! The story can be very back and forth almost as quickly as a tennis match which is always hard for me, but still, 5 out of 5!

Steph: I give this book 4.5. I found the story engaging and the story and structure were very tightly composed. I love the way he weaves the native symbolism and myths together with white/christian symbolism and myth. The way he is able to juxtapose these two worlds really emphasizes the fluidity of native storytelling and culture as opposed to the rigidity of white storytelling and culture. I was also really impressed with the cyclic nature that can be found in the composition of the story, as well as the character's lives: Eli goes away and comes home; Lionel loses his way, but comes around; Charlie leaves his father, but goes back to him; Norma replaces Eli and rebuilds the cabin. 

I also found the interplay between the genders very interesting. In the white culture, women are for procreation and that is all - they are definitely held inferior to men. However, the Native women are strong female characters. It is only when the women are within the white world that they are considered less or disrespected. There is also beautiful fluidity between the genders: the old Indians are at times both male and female. 

It is a tiny bit confusing if you do not have a base knowledge about Native storytelling and imagery, but it does all come together. I hope people are able to stick through the first part of the book and see it all come together and make sense. King's humour and vivid imagery are a well deserved reward for sticking it out. 

Lindsay: I was assigned to read GGRW almost 10 years ago, during my first year in college. I remember thinking, “this is weird - who is this Coyote and Lone Ranger and Ishmael and Robinson Crusoe and Hawkeye and First Woman and Thought Woman and Changing Woman and Old Woman and ‘I’?” I was hoping that reading the novel a second time around - especially after reading a few other Aboriginal-based books recently with The Women From Away - would bring more clarity and understanding, but to be honest, I still had a lot of those same questions this time. However, I think I can say with confidence that although there a lot of Green Grass that was still over my head, in terms of symbology, references and humour, I think I grasped onto more than the first time I read it, so I’ll count that as a win!

Allusions aside, I really enjoyed reading about the stories of main characters Alberta, Lionel, Eli, Charlie, and Latisha. I was profoundly struck, moreso than ever before, by the struggle that exists for those searching for the middle ground that exists between Native American tradition and the modern world. The character of Norma brought to my attention my ignorance on the subject, which I am grateful for. I also thoroughly the sometimes subtle and sometimes not-so-subtle commentary on racism, gender issues, and national identity nicely executed by King.

In short, GGRW was a gratifying read for me. Although I know there’s still a lot that was missed on my part, what I did grad onto was very good and incredibly well-written; I was engaged and interested in the personal stories of the main characters. I rate Green Grass Running Water a 4/5.

Lauren: I like how he experimented with his writing. I think it makes reading more challenging. There seemed to be some hidden messages throughout the book, which made it feel like a puzzle in some ways. I found certain parts a little bit frustrating, such as the scenes with coyote. I found that character slightly irritating and those scenes a little hard to follow because I wasn’t sure if they were real people or a figment of someone’s imagination.

What I liked most was his humor and his writing of the people in blossom. It was the little things about this book that I felt had the biggest impact to me and also the most truth. Some examples of scenes I enjoyed – when she whispers “You are Canadian” to her children after her husband is telling her all of these negative things in comparison to Americans, scene where Lionel is discussing how he's going to change his life and the humorous dialogue he invents with his parents and Alberta, scenes in the restaurant where they were pretending to serve dog meat to the tourists.

I also really enjoyed the parts of the book that made me feel the connection to the native spirit and to nature - particularly where he mentions green grass and running water. It almost touched me in a way! I felt I got more of a sense for the aboriginal world while reading this book than I did during the others we have read for book club. I think he was able to infuse their culture and beliefs into so many scenes in the book that sometimes I was even unaware that it was happening. He was creative and I enjoyed his depiction of Canadian aboriginal peoples. 

Year Three Book Three: 

Interpreter of Maladies by Jhumpa Lahiri

December 17, 2015

Laura R: My first 5! This book has all the right things: it’s well written, it’s sad, and it’s about India. At first I was not looking forward to reading a compilation of short stories. I thought the stories would be too short to connect with. I finished the first story in one go, and was immediately excited to read the rest of the book. The author did an amazing job writing characters with depth and emotion. Some of the stories ended abruptly, but they still seemed complete. I was surprised to feel a connection to some of the characters, even though on the surface, I have nothing in common with them.

Amy: I give this wee book a 5 out of 5. I was skeptical that this collection of short stories could captivate my attention as I had a firm belief that short stories only belong on beach vacations! But Jhumpa Lahiri got me right from the beginning. I was shocked at how the strength of Lahiri's writing could draw me in in just a couple of pages!! This may be a wee book, but it is mighty! 

Steph: I give this book a 5 - the first 5 I have ever given! It is the mark of a good writer when he or she can pull you in and create believable, real characters. Not only does Lahiri do this, but she does it within a few short pages. I have always been fairly wary of short story collections. For some reason, I got it into my head that I just didn't like them. However, I think I might have been wrong. Lahiri is such an amazing writer, who can pull you in and attach you to the - sometimes likable, sometimes not - characters. You follow each character and invest yourself in his or her story without even knowing it. Her stories are set in India and the United States, but the humanity of the characters surpasses setting. They are raw and they make the same decisions that I could see myself making - feel the same feelings that I have felt. I am very curious about Lahiri's other work and, especially given her ability to work magic in the span of a few short pages, am very excited to see what she can do over the course of a whole novel. A must read for sure!

Year Three Book Two: 

North of Normal by Cea Sunrise Person

November 19, 2015

Steph: I will give North of Normal a 3. The book was an easy read - I read most of it in a day. But despite that, there is just something about the book that did not draw me in. I really wanted to like this story more and I hate "rating" someone's life-story; I respect her story and her experiences, but the writing just did not resonate with me. I do not think her voice worked as a child's voice, something that may have been fixed through a restructuring of the book. At its heart, memory is not chronological, and I do not think that all stories work chronologically either. I think that if she spent more time in her adolescent and adult years with flashbacks to those memories of her childhood, rather than trying to stick to a chronological timeline, her story would have been more impactful. More importantly, her "recovery" from her childhood would have been more impactful.

Where the writing did not work for me, the sheer absurdity of her experiences as a child fascinated me. I know that children slip through the cracks all the time, but to hear a firsthand account is amazing. It is so far removed from any experience I had as a child - but set in the same landscape that I grew up in. This was probably the most compelling part of the story for me: the cognitive dissonance I felt when reading her foreign experiences in a place I know so well. She is a strong woman and I wish that she better highlighted her evolution from a dysfunctional (dare I say, abusive) childhood to a stable (?) adulthood.

Lindsay: I am choosing to give this book a 3 out of 5. True, it had one very redeeming quality for me: this non-fiction story is almost just too crazy to be believed! So the sheer intrigue / astonishment / disbelief kept this girl – who had a relatively conventional childhood – continually interested. I certainly wasn’t ever bored reading NoN, that’s for sure. The book wasn’t difficult to follow; I’d deem it an “easy read”, which was nice as it allowed me to pick it up and put it down whenever I had a few spare minutes (or hours) of time to commit to it.

I feel unable to rate the book higher because the writing itself failed to “wow” me. I would consider the writing style descriptive but not complex, and its simple straightforwardness left me at times unsatisfied. The author’s telling of her adult life also felt a bit awkward to me, as it was glazed over quite quickly in comparison to the detailed account of her childhood. I understand that the focus of the book is based on her childhood in the wilderness, but I struggled to understand and resonate with the person behind grown-up Cea.

That being said, there’s no denying the courage and sheer resolve demonstrated by the author, and for this she deserves to be commended. Interesting, easy read + lack of depth = 3/5.

Laura R: I rate this book 3 out of 5. Well written, fun to read, very engaging story. I enjoy reading books set near Calgary, in places that I’ve been. It is crazy to imagine such a drastic change in lifestyle. Struggle and disappointment in her teen years drives her to want something more. Childhood freedom leads her to feel comfortable traveling across the world alone, and arriving in Paris with nowhere to sleep. Brings up many topics for discussion, but these topics weren’t really explored in the book. In theory, living off the land and living in the moment could be very positive lessons to teach and raise a family with. It’s unfortunate that the family also experiences abuse, neglect, and criminality. The way the story was told, I went through cycles of liking and disliking each character. Even at some points I thought Cea had become an unlikable, seemed like some of the modeling parts were a bit over the top and shallow.

Nikki: I am going to give this book a 5! Based on pure enjoyment. This was the first book I have found in a while that I couldn’t put down and couldn’t wait to read. I am a big fan of non-fiction especially when it is based in western Canada. I found it really exciting to read about Cea’s unique childhood and see how she came out the other side to be a generally okay functioning person. I liked seeing the transformation of the characters throughout the book and how her feelings towards her family, especially Papa Dick, changed. I also enjoyed that it was written as somewhat of a novel more so than a typical memoir, for entertainment sake. One of the main critiques I and the rest of the group it seemed had on this book was that we didn’t like how stretched out her childhood was and it seems like her teenage years and adult life were just breezed through. While I know the book was intended to be about her childhood I think it either should have been solely about that or there should have been more emphasis on her early adult life. From the snippets we got it seemed that it was equally as interesting as her childhood, and wasn’t all smooth sailing. While I don’t know if I got any kind of big lesson or moral from the story, that isn’t necessarily what I look for in books, I got entertainment and a bit of escape from it. I hope she does a grown-up-life-follow up!

Lacey: North of Normal-  3.5 for me! I felt like it was a easy read with a story that really drags you into it. At the book discussion there was lots of observation around the writers "voice" which I think made me pay special attention as I read,  I had a feeling as where as she is not the most phenomenal writer I did kind of feel like I was sitting with her as she told her story, I like the balance of the feeling that it was a story but also her memories. I think it takes a lot of bravery to tell ones stories and especially when it contains so many complex feelings regarding humans that one loves, over all  enjoyed it.

Danielle: I really enjoyed reading this, she has lead a very interesting life and it made for a good book.  I wish that she had spent more time discussing her teenage and adult years as it felt like she just quickly skipped through those parts. I would have liked to know more about her relationship with her father and how she got to that point.  I appreciate the fact that she didn't use a ghost writer as it was her story to tell and I think she told it well. Hearing it come from her own words made it more personal for me. I struggled with hearing how Cea's mother could have willingly let all this happen to her daughter. The photos in the book helped remind me that her mother was only a child herself, she looks so young and it's hard to blame her for what happened. I give this book 4/5


Amy: Okay, I am going to give this a 2 out of 5. You'll give me the stink eye, which I respect, but I am sticking to my "It's ok" rating. There was so much emphasis on Cea's childhood that it seemed unbalanced with her teenage and adult story, that 3/4 through I found myself asking "Why am I reading this?". It feels harsh to critique a biography that way because it isn't realistic for every kid that grows up in a vulnerable situation to become Child and Youth Advocate of the decade, but I was looking for more of a "Booya!" moment and it just seemed to fizzle. 

Lauren: I couldn't put this book down and read it within 24 hours. It reminded me a lot of “The Glass Castle” which was another memoir that I loved. I rate it 5 out of 5

I love the drama of an unconventional family and I find it interesting to think about how an upbringing changes you and shapes you into the person you become later in life. I was impressed by her resilience and independence. I think she did a fantastic job of writing this book about her life with the added challenge of most of these experiences happening while she was a child. I found it refreshing that she was able to give us an adult perspective on what she went through, while still staying true to the fact that she was under 5 then and didn’t fully grasp her situation at the time. I think she did a better job capturing this than other books I have read. I’m thinking in particular of Room (fiction), where I almost felt the perspective of the book being from a 5 year old’s point of view was exhausting and irritating.

I’ve heard some criticisms that she rushed through her adulthood too much and I agree that the end was lacking and I wish could have learned more about how she feels looking back on her upbringing now and how she feels it has affected the person that she is. But I think maybe she hasn’t quite figured that out for herself yet.  I also would have been interested to hear a bit more about her parent’s lives and how they ended up where they were. Overall, I found it a fascinating story and was thoroughly entertained.

Year Three Book One: 

Birdie by Tracey Lindberg

October 8, 2015

Laura: My rating is 4 out of 5. The timeline was challenging to follow, especially when some events got mentioned repeatedly. This type of storytelling made me think about how people experience traumatic events. They can come back to affect you at multiple times during your life, and have different meanings each time. Like some of the others commented; the challenging story line makes the reading more rewarding when you do put together the pieces.  By the end, I think I finally got the timeline as: Childhood in Loon Lake,Town (Grand Prairie?) with Aunt Val, Foster home with the Inglesons, Streets in Edmonton, Hospital (San), Gibsons, working at the bakery with Lola, dream journey.

After finishing the book, I still couldn’t figure out what put her in the hospital with the burns. Did someone light her on fire while she was in Edmonton? Or did she light herself on fire while killing her uncle? When/where did she kill her uncle? Then I came across this review and discussion on Cree law.

http://equality.jotwell.com/cree-lawfulness-and-unlawfulness/

A great read but beware of the spoilers.

Many times the book mentioned Bernie being a “half-blood” and that her family couldn’t get a house on the reserve. Encouraged me to read more about history and definitions of Metis and First Nations.

Learned something new. Also really liked the smushed words; sistercousin, sleepwake, etc. Definitely want to read again.

Nikki: I am going to give this book a 3.5. To be honest it took a while for me to get into this book, I found it very confusing and hard to follow at first. Because it didn’t follow a strict timeline or have some sort of pattern or cues as to where in time you were it was tricky. There was a distinct turning point, however, that instantly hooked me into the book. When she returns home and you finally get a little more clarity into what happened with the uncles, it starts to help everything line up. I also really enjoyed when the story started to be broken down and told from the perspective of each woman. What I enjoyed most about this book was the discussion we had. Hearing everyone’s insight and comprehension on the book (especially Angela’s!) made me enjoy the book even more, it really helped me to understand more of the meaning and symbolism. Like for instance when reading the book I wasn’t a huge fan of the combo words, but hearing how the come from aboriginal culture made me appreciate them so much more. Thanks everyone for making me love this book more! 

Lindsay: I give this book a 4 out of 5. I really, really liked it, and in fact, the reason that I’m not ranking it higher is  because truth be told, I found parts of the storyline, references, and symbolism confusing. If I were perhaps more fluent in Aboriginal allegory, I think I not only could have had more clarity, but gotten more out of the book. That being said, I enjoyed the circular storytelling technique used by Lindberg as the pieces of Birdie’s life were revealed to readers. It felt like a puzzle to me, where each chapter, each paragraph unraveled one more piece of her history. At times I found myself engaged so deeply in the reading that it took me a few moments to reground myself back into reality when I put the book down! This for me is a telltale sign of a very strong body of writing; I was truly transported as I flipped through the pages.

I look forward to re-reading Birdie in the future in hopes of both a greater understanding, and even fuller appreciation.

“ … prepare yourself for the possibility that you don’t know all of the possibilities; grace and goodness can come just as fast and honestly as any other circumstance” –Tracy Lindberg, closing thought “For Book Clubs: An Author Interview”

Robyn: This was a challenge. And I wouldn't have it any other way. I found it was hard to understand and follow at first. The circular way of storytelling that I loved in monkey beach was much harder to follow in birdie but more exciting when all of the pieces began to fit together about halfway through this book. I loved the bond birdie found in her women. The reliance and support they provided to become her 'womenfamily' each bringing something unique to birdie. I loved their ability to just trust the process she was going through. Coming from a medical background I found I was growining increasingly concerned about birdies welfare as they "did nothing" how we were actually doing what was needed. The part where she goes outside of herself and sees herself lying on the bed in her filth reminded me of Amanda lindhout going outside of herself when she was being tortured. Comparing how trauma so often causes someone to have an extreme reaction although I understand it's a fiction vs non fiction.  Overall I'd give it a 3.5 stars.

Steph: I would give this book a 4. I really enjoyed Birdie - I thought it was a well-written and well conceived story. The structure was [at times] confusing but it didn't take too long to get back on track.The interplay of trauma and memory, and how it manifests itself in the physical reality, was very interesting. Birdie enters silence because she needs to disconnect and process the trauma(s) in her life. She inhabits her body [or doesn't] as a method of coping – either through her weight or through the men she let's use her [or doesn't might use her]. I liked Birdie as a character because she has a complexity that adds to her believability. The running themes of home [made by the women in the family] and silence [good silence versus bad silence] really offer insight into what it means to be [native] woman in this day. It is a very valuable piece of writing.

As a said before the writing was it times confusing, but it wasn't bad enough to detract from the story. It may even offer a layer of something to pull you into the story a little more… Birdie herself is at times confused about what's happening to her - what happened to her - so the reader gets to share that. I might also "criticize" the story insofar as I wished she had gone further with the other characters. I really wanted to hear more from her mother and from her cousin. And from her aunt. I think their stories might be really interesting too, but I understand why the author focused on Birdie. I think that a little more from the mother might have pushed it to 4.5 for me. Maybe also a little more clarity in the writing - but I really do like her style and there were phrases that really jumped off the page at me - especially how she used language by combing words (bigelegance, sleepingwake, BigHer). I vaguely remember learning in my syntax class that some native languages do combine words like this as a part of their grammar… I don't know if Cree is one of those but I suspect that it is. I love the way she plays with language, with words, to add even more meaning to what Birdie is feeling or experiencing.

Nicole: I would give this book a 4 out of 5. I was very into this book. I can understand the comparison to both Monkey Beach and Green Grass Running water as two other important Aboriginal stories from Canada. I found that it was a little more difficult to follow than Monkey Beach and that there was not as much connection to the land that we notice in Green Grass but I can see the connecting themes and voice. 

Some of my favourite parts of this book were learning about the group of ladies that stuck together in a rather unconventional "ladies stick together" way. It was noted by the author that these ladies stay together because of their reliance on each other, their common experiences with men that leave and their one commonality - having no one. I appreciated the honesty behind this story, not expecting women to be strong for each other and to power through trauma but instead the reality that healing takes time and trauma can take over.  Another part of the book that stood out to me was the idea of women taking up space. Early in the book Birdie speaks to the space she occupies in a room both physically and emotionally and despite size or true presence I understand this as a common female thought - am I in the way? I valued the statements of concern from Birdie about being burdensome or too much, I think this speaks to what each of us have thought at some point. 


Amy: I would give this book a 4.5 out of 5. Just before I started "Birdie"I started "Bad Medicine: A Judge's Struggle for Justice in a First Nations Community" by John Reilly and read this line that stuck with me through the reading of "Birdie":

"We [non-aboriginal people] see wrongdoing as something that needs to be punished. They [Stoney First Nation] see it as an illness in need of healing and as ignorance in need of teaching." pg.46 

Through the main character Bernice, Birdie, Lindberg takes an incredibly complex trauma from heartbreaking beginning to a relativity reconciled end. The story line is circular and mystical so I would suggest approaching it an open mind and a note book! 

I could identify with some of Birdie's character in the struggle to fit in based on her struggle to fit in and to hang on to your core identity despite your life circumstances. But for the most part, I felt that as an Albertan ( from Calgary and familiar with Edmonton) it was important just to absorb this story as an important way to further understand and ally with a deeply hurting part of my community. 

Must read!!


Danielle: Unfortunately I did not finish this book, but after listening to the reviews of the other girls I am excited to read it. I give the cover of the book 5/5.

Year Two Retreat: The Winners Are...

August 28-30, 2015 Invermere BC

 

Photo by Lindsay (elle.peters)

Our book list for the 2015-2016 season 
Stay tuned as we blog about each of these books in the year to come. Read along with us!

Canadian Literature:  

 

Biography/Memoir:

             

Award Winners: